Executive Summary
The subject is a three-story corner building: six apartments on the upper floors and two ground-floor retail bays. Gross income splits roughly seventy-thirty in favour of the apartments, which is precisely why the property is priced as a residential asset by most bidders. Our position is that the storefront income cannot be capitalized at the residential rate, because its volatility, downtime and re-tenanting cost profile are entirely different. Separating the streams moves the supportable price meaningfully below the asking basis without changing a single assumption about the neighbourhood.
